State v. Robinson

CourtListener 10138106Scctapp08.02.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Markei Robinson,       
Appellant

Appeal From Richland County

Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-094

Submitted February 1, 2005 – Filed February 8, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Markei Robinson,
was indicted for and convicted of one count of first-degree burglary and one
count of second-degree burglary.  The trial judge sentenced Robinson to concurrent
terms of thirty years on the first-degree burglary charge and fifteen years
on the second-degree burglary charge.  Robinson’s counsel attached to the brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record
and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Robinson has filed a separate pro
se brief.  We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991). 
Counsel’s petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.