State v. Hunter

CourtListener 10138096Scctapp10.02.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED
BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Larry Hunter, Jr.,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-104

Submitted February 1, 2005 – Filed February
10, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Larry Hunter, Jr. appeals his
guilty plea to armed robbery.  Counsel for Hunter attached to the final brief
a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Hunter did not file a separate pro se
response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Hunter’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.