State v. Suber

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Nathaniel Suber,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

Marc H. Westbrook, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-007

Submitted January 1, 2005 – Filed January
7, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Nathaniel Suber appeals the revocation of his probation. 
In November of 1998, Suber was sentenced to five years on each of three counts
of third degree burglary, suspended upon the service of five years probation. 
After Suber violated several conditions of his probation, the circuit judge
revoked three years of Suber’s original sentence.  Suber’s appellate counsel
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 
Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation,
asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit.  Suber
did not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1]
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.