State v. Cribbs

CourtListener 10138033Scctapp13.01.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Peter Carl Cribbs Appellant.

Appeal From Union County

John C. Hayes III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-020

Submitted January 1, 2005 -  Filed January
13, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E.
Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Peter Carl Cribbs pled
guilty to possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, second offense,
possession of ice with intent to distribute, second offense, possession of a
Schedule I controlled substance, second offense, and escape.  He was sentenced
to ten years, twelve years plus a $50,000 fine, one year, and five years, to
be served concurrently.  Cribbs’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel additionally submitted
a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are no directly
appealable issues of arguable merit.  Further, Cribbs filed a pro se
response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant
to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT,
JJ., concur.

[1]
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.