CourtListener 10138027•State v. Littlejohn
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State of South Carolina, Respondent,
v.
Sheridan T. Littlejohn, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-027
Submitted January 1, 2005 Filed January
13, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney
General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant, Sheridan T. Littlejohn, was indicted for and
convicted of trafficking in crack cocaine and possession of crack cocaine with
intent to distribute within the proximity of a school. The trial judge sentenced
Littlejohn to fifteen years on the proximity charge and twenty-five years for
trafficking. Littlejohns counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved
as counsel, stating that he had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal
lacks merit. Littlejohn has filed a separate pro se brief. We
dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991). Counsels petition to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, KITTREDGE, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.