State v. Oxendine

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Donald Mack Oxendine, Appellant.

Appeal From Dillon County

 John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-563

Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November
8, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia,
for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Donald Mack Oxendine appeals his conviction for second-degree
burglary.  Counsel for Oxendine attached to the final brief a petition to be
relieved as counsel.  Oxendine filed a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on
their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Oxendine’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.