State v. Ferebee

CourtListener 10137911Scctapp09.11.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sakina Ferebee, Appellant.

Appeal From Beaufort County

J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-565

Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November
9, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Randolph Murdaugh, III, of Hampton,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Sakina Ferebee appeals her guilty plea to assault and battery
with intent to kill.  Counsel for Ferebee attached to the final brief a petition
to be relieved as counsel.  Ferebee did not file a separate pro se response.

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on
their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Ferebee’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.