State v. Snider

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Daniel Snider,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

J.C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-573

Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November 16, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Deputy Director Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., J. Benjamin
Aplin, Lovee M. Watts, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Daniel Snider appeals
the revocation of his parole, arguing the trial court erroneously considered
his failure to pay fees and fines in determining he violated parole.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Snider’s appeal under Rule 220(b)(2),
SCACR, and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.