State v. Brown

CourtListener 10137896Scctapp17.11.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ronell R. Brown, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

 A. Victor Rawl, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-583

Submitted November 1, 2004 – Filed November
17, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellant Defender Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W.
McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott , all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Ronell R. Brown was indicted for assault on a police officer
while resisting arrest.  He pled guilty to the charge.  The trial court sentenced
him to a youthful offender sentence not to exceed six years.  Brown’s counsel
attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel stating she
had reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacked merit.  Brown did not
file a pro se response.  We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991).  Counsel’s petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, BEATTY, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur. 

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.