CourtListener 10137896•State v. Brown
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Ronell R. Brown, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
A. Victor Rawl, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-583
Submitted November 1, 2004 Filed November
17, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellant Defender Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W.
McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott , all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ronell R. Brown was indicted for assault on a police officer
while resisting arrest. He pled guilty to the charge. The trial court sentenced
him to a youthful offender sentence not to exceed six years. Browns counsel
attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel stating she
had reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacked merit. Brown did not
file a pro se response. We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991). Counsels petition to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, BEATTY, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.