CourtListener 10137846•State v. Brown
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED
BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Christopher Brown,
Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-527
Submitted October 1, 2004 Filed October 18, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott , all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Christopher Brown appeals his
guilty plea to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. Counsel
for Brown attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.
Brown did not file a separate pro se response.
After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Browns appeal and
grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
STILWELL, BEATTY, and SHORT, JJ., concur.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.