State v. Jones

CourtListener 10137807Scctapp16.09.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clarence
D. Jones, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 2004-UP-472

Submitted September 14, 2004 – Filed
September 16, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne D. White, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Clarence D. Jones was convicted of assault and battery
with intent to kill (ABIK) and assault and battery of a high and aggravated
nature (ABHAN).  For each charge, he was sentenced to six years, suspended upon
the service of three years, plus three years probation, to be served concurrently. 
Jones’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).  Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved
from representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable
merit.  Jones filed a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, ANDERSON, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1]
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.