In The Interest of: Coby P.

CourtListener 10137779Scctapp23.08.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED
ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Interest of: Coby P., a minor under the age of seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 R. Kinard Johnson, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-440

Submitted July 7, 2004 – Filed August 23, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Coby P. appeals his conviction
for second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor.  He maintains the family
court should have granted a new trial based upon the purported insufficiency
of the evidence.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
[1] Coby P.’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1]        We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule
215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.