CourtListener 10137725•State v. Rogers
Gesamter Gesetzestext
PER CURIAM: Robert McKoy waived presentment on an indictment for possession
of a stolen vehicle, pled guilty, and was sentenc
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Raymond Dean Rogers, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-379
Submitted April 21, 2004 Filed June
17, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellant Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of Appellate Defense,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Raymond Dean Rogers was indicted
for and pled guilty to breach of trust with fraudulent intent. Rogers appellate
counsel submitted a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed
the record and has concluded Rogers appeal is without merit. Rogers filed
a pro se brief with the court.
After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Rogers appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
[1]
Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal,
we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2),
SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.