State v. Schilling

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert D. Schilling, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-375

Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June 17, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Robert D. Schilling pled guilty to bank fraud
and forgery and was sentenced to three years imprisonment on both charges, the
sentences to run concurrently.  Additionally, Schilling pled guilty to violation
of his probation for unrelated charges, and the circuit court revoked three
years of his probation and terminated it, the three years of revoked probation
to run concurrently with the previous sentences.  Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Schilling’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved. 
Schilling did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Schilling’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.