State v. Amadeo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. 
IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Gregory Amadeo,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

James R. Barber, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-385

Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June 18, 2004

APPEAL DISMSISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, of Columbia;  and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Gregory Amadeo appeals his
plea to charges of driving under the influence and of driving under suspension.
Counsel for Amadeo attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as
counsel. Amadeo did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Amadeo’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.