CourtListener 10137666•State v. Gibson
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS
NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Derrick Gibson, Appellant.
Appeal From Clarendon
County
Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-294
Submitted February 23, 2004
Filed May 5, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant
pled guilty to three counts of second-degree burglary and was sentenced to concurrent
ten-year sentences on the three charges. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellants counsel attached a petition to be relieved.
Appellant did not file a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.