State v. Williams

THIS OPINION HAS
NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Titus Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-299

Submitted February 23, 2004
– Filed May 5, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant  Appellate
Defender Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, of Columbia; and Solicitor
Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Titus Williams
appeals his convictions on distribution of crack cocaine and distribution of
crack cocaine within the proximity of a park.  His appellate counsel has petitioned
to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the record and has concluded
Williams’s appeal is without merit.  The sole issue briefed by counsel generally
argues the circuit court erred in “issuing an illegal sentence” in the case. 
In a separate pro se brief, Williams raises several issues related to
his mistrial motion, sixth amendment rights, curative instructions, admission
of evidence, and fourth amendment rights.

After review of the record pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concur.

[1]   We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule
215, SCACR.