State v. Munn

CourtListener 10137574Scctapp20.04.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT

BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT
IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Julius Munn,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

A. Victor Rawl, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-273

Submitted February 23, 2004 – Filed
April 20, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Daragan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant pled guilty but mentally
ill to assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct in the first degree
and assault and battery with intent to kill.  He was sentenced to thirty years
in prison.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant’s
counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Appellant did not file a pro
se response. 

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,  305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.