CourtListener 10137573•State v. Norton
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT
IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Deryl Norton,
Appellant.
Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-272
Submitted February 23, 2004 Filed
April 20, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of
Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Appellant pled guilty to four
counts of armed robbery and two weapons charges. He was sentenced to
seventeen years in prison. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), appellants counsel attached a petition to be relieved. Appellant
did not file a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.