CourtListener 10137520•State v. Doby
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Trevor B. Doby,
Appellant.
Appeal From Florence County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-182
Submitted January 29, 2004 Filed March
17, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Trevor B.
Doby was indicted for one count of second-degree burglary, one count of grand
larceny, two counts of financial transaction card fraud, three counts of financial
identity fraud, three counts of financial transaction card theft, and twenty
counts of forgery. Doby pled guilty to two counts of financial transaction
card fraud, three counts of financial identity fraud, and fifteen counts of
forgery. He was sentenced to five years imprisonment on each charge, the sentences
to run concurrently. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), Dobys counsel attached a petition to be relieved. Doby did not file
a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Dobys appeal and grant counsels petition
to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving
any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.