State v. Harris

CourtListener 10137477Scctapp30.03.2004

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Fredrick Jermaine Harris,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

John W. Kittredge, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-224

Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March
30, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh,  Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Frederick
Jermaine Harris was indicted for one count of conspiracy, one count of first-degree
burglary, and two counts of armed robbery.  Harris was found guilty, and the
circuit court sentenced him to five years imprisonment for conspiracy, and to
three concurrent twenty-seven year sentences on the remaining charges.  Pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Harris’ counsel attached
a petition to be relieved.  Harris filed a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Harris’ appeal and grant counsel’s petition
to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving
any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.