CourtListener 10137394•State v. McCluney
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Curtis Miles McCluney,
Appellant.
Appeal From Cherokee County
Gary E. Clary, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-133
Submitted December 23, 2003 Filed
February 26, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Curtis Miles
McCluney was convicted of armed robbery and assault and battery with intent
to kill. The circuit court sentenced him to life imprisonment on each charge,
with the sentences to run consecutively. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), McCluneys counsel attached a petition to be relieved.
McCluney did not file a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss McCluneys appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concurring
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.