CourtListener 10137263•State v. Jefferies
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Virgil Lee Jefferies,
Appellant.
__________
Appeal From Cherokee County
Gary E. Clary, Circuit Court Judge
__________
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-645
Submitted August 20, 2003 Filed November
4, 2003
__________
APPEAL DISMISSED
__________
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, Office
of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Virgil Lee Jefferies appeals
from his guilty plea to distribution of crack cocaine. Jefferies contends the
trial judge erred by accepting his guilty plea without advising him of the sentencing
consequences. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Jefferies counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel,
stating she reviewed the record and concluded Jefferies appeal lacks merit.
Jefferies filed a pro se brief, arguing the trial judge erred
in denying his motion to dismiss his attorney. After a thorough review of the
record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss [1] Jefferies appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.