CourtListener 10137189•State v. Smalls
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Morris Clayton Smalls,
Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
A. Victor Rawl, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-624
Submitted August 20, 2003 Filed
October 21, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Morris Clayton Smalls was indicted
for trafficking in cocaine, possession with intent to distribute within proximity
of a school, and conspiracy to violate South Carolinas narcotics laws. The
State did not go forward with conspiracy to violate South Carolinas narcotics
laws because of an insufficient indictment. The jury convicted him as charged
of trafficking in cocaine and possession with intent to distribute within proximity
of a school. The judge sentenced him to seven years on each charge to run concurrently.
Smalls appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved
from representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable
merit. Smalls filed a pro se response with the Court.
After a review of the record pursuant to Anders
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON,
JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.