Phan v. Quang

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Nguyet Phan,       
Respondent,

v.

Tuong Thien Quang,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-548

Submitted July 15, 2003 – Filed September
25, 2003

AFFIRMED

Tuong Thien Quang, of Mount Pleasant; for Appellant, pro
se.

Nguyet Phan, of Charleston; for Respondent, pro se.

PER CURIAM: Nguyet Pahn filed suit in magistrate’s
court for money due on a note against Tong Thien Quang.  The magistrate held
in favor of Phan for an amount of $6,255.00, finding that Quang had repaid a
portion of the note.  Quang appealed the judgment to circuit court arguing that
the amount he already paid was $5,000 and that the amount due under the note
was only $3,000.  The circuit judge affirmed the magistrate.  Quang appealed,
and we affirm [1] pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR, and the following authorities: 
Hadfield v. Gilchrist, 343 S.C. 88, 538 S.E.2d 268 (Ct. App. 2000) (stating
that on review of a circuit court’s affirmance of a magistrate’s judgment, the
Court of Appeals will affirm, absent an error of law, if there are any facts
supporting the circuit court’s order); Vacation Time of Hilton Head Island
v. Kiwi Corp., 280 S.C. 232, 312 S.E.2d 20 (Ct. App. 1984) (noting that
the Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction to reverse findings of fact of
the circuit court on review from the magistrate’s court if there is any supporting
evidence).

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.

[1]   We affirm this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.