CourtListener 10137035•State v. Hook
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Roy Hook,
Appellant.
Appeal From Barnwell County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-442
Submitted April 18, 2003 Filed June 25, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Theresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Roy E. Hook was indicted for
possession of marijuana with intent to distribute near a school or park. Hook
pled guilty and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment, suspended upon the
service of five years probation, performance of 240 hours public service employment,
payment of a $300 fine, completion of substance abuse counseling, and random
drug testing. Hook appeals, arguing that the circuit court erred in revoking
his probation. Counsel for Hook has filed a final brief and submitted a petition
to be relieved as counsel.1
Hook also filed a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels
motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CURETON and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
1
Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal,
we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.