State v. Ervin

CourtListener 10137018Scctapp06.05.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Travis Ervin,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Gary E. Clary, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-315

Submitted February 20, 2003 – Filed May 6, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of the
South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Travis Ervin (Appellant) was
convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to twenty years in prison.  On appeal,
counsel for Appellant has filed a final brief along with a petition to be relieved
as counsel.  Appellant has not filed a pro se response.  After
a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.         
   

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.

[1]   We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.