CourtListener 10136906•State v. Dunbar
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Kelvin Dunbar,
Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-186
Submitted January 10, 2003 Filed March 11, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of SC Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Kelvin Dunbar was sentenced
to five years in prison suspended with two years probation, with credit for
eighty-one days in jail, for possession of a stolen vehicle, simple assault,
and trespassing. Dunbar was brought before the court for a second time for
violating the following provisions of his probation: not reporting to the probation
officer, being convicted of criminal domestic violence, and not paying supervision
fees or surcharge. The trial court revoked thirty months of Dunbars probation
and gave him credit for time served. Dunbar appeals.
Dunbars appellate counsel submitted a petition
to be relieved as counsel, stating he had reviewed the record and has concluded
Dunbars appeal is without merit. The issue raised in counsels brief concerns
whether the trial judge abused his discretion in revoking thirty months of Dunbars
sentence. Dunbar filed a document with the court containing numerous arguments.
After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Dunbars appeal
and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY, and SHULER,
JJ.,
concur.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court
in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.