State v. Fleming

CourtListener 10136892Scctapp17.03.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Douglas Eric Fleming,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-201

Submitted January 29, 2003 – Filed March 17, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia,
for Appellant.                                                  

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Douglas Fleming appeals from
his probation revocation, arguing his right to due process was violated because
he was not provided a preliminary hearing.  After a thorough review of the record
and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Fleming’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.