State v. Dixon

CourtListener 10136866Scctapp04.02.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Teasha Levie Dixon,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Marion County

James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-093

Submitted November 20, 2002 – Filed
February 4, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia;
for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Teasha Levie Dixon appeals
her convictions and sentence for distribution of crack cocaine and distribution
of crack cocaine within proximity of a school.  Counsel for Dixon attached to
the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Dixon did not file a
separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Dixon’s appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ.,
concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.