State v. Conyers

PER CURIAM: Keith Lamont Conyers appeals the revocation of his probation

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Keith Lamont Conyers,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2003-UP-079

Submitted November 20, 2002 – Filed
January 28, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia;
for Appellant

Deputy Director for Legal Services Theresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin,  all of Columbia;
for Respondent(s).

PER CURIAM:  Keith Lamont Conyers appeals
the revocation of his probation.  On November 29, 2000, Conyers pleaded guilty
to driving under the influence (third offense). The judge sentenced Conyers
to three years imprisonment and payment of a $4,000 fine, suspended on time
served of 110 days, a $2,000 fine, and three years probation.  After he violated
several conditions of his probation and pleaded guilty to driving under suspension
(third offense), the judge revoked three years of the original sentence and
converted the outstanding fines and fees to a civil judgment.  This sentence
was to be served concurrently with the three-year sentence Conyers received
for pleading guilty to driving under suspension.  The judge credited Conyers
for time he had served prior to the hearing.  

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), counsel for Conyers attached to the final brief a petition to be
relieved as counsel, stating she had reviewed the record and concluded Conyers’
appeal is without merit.  Conyers did not file a separate pro se
response.

After a thorough review of the record
pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ.,
concur.