CourtListener 10128732•State v. Devajay R. Stevens
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Devajay Rahiem Stevens, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2022-000902
Appeal From Barnwell County
Courtney Clyburn Pope, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-326
Submitted September 1, 2024 – Filed October 2, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and
Devajay Rahiem Stevens, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and MCDONALD and TURNER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.