CourtListener 10128721•State v. Ryan E. Stevens
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Ryan Edwards Stevens, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-001610
Appeal From Orangeburg County
Heath P. Taylor, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-322
Submitted September 1, 2024 – Filed October 2, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1
WILLIAMS, C.J., and MCDONALD and TURNER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.