Leskey v. Dept. of Rev.

TC-MD 170255NOrtc

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 170255N 1
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT
MAGISTRATE DIVISION
Income Tax
TAMMI L. LESKEY, )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff, TC-MD 170255N
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
State of Oregon,
FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL1
Defendant.
This matter came before the court on its own motion to dismiss.
In her Complaint, filed July 7, 2017, Plaintiff identified the tax year appealed as “2013,”
but did not include a copy of the notice she was appealing. During the first case management
conference held November 1, 2017, Plaintiff stated that she intended to appeal the 2012 and
2013 tax years. The parties also requested a second case management conference, which the
court initially set for 9:00 a.m. on December 12, 2017.
On November 2, 2017, the court issued a Journal Entry, instructing Plaintiff to use the
Magistrate Division’s Amended Complaint form if she wished to include an additional tax year
in her appeal. Plaintiff also was instructed to attach copies of the notices she wanted to appeal
for each tax year.
On December 4, 2017, after confirming Plaintiff’s availability, the court rescheduled the
second case management conference for 9:45 a.m. on December 13, 2017. Plaintiff failed to
appear. The court issued an Order on December 15, 2017, requiring Plaintiff to file a written
response within 14 days and explain why she failed to appear and why she had not filed an
1 This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court’s Decision of Dismissal, entered
January 11, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision
of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1).
FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 170255N 2
amended complaint or provided the court with copies of the notices for the tax years she is
appealing. Plaintiff did not file a response with the court within the time allowed.
This court has authority to enforce its order by sanctions, including but not limited to,
dismissal of a case. Tax Court Rule-Magistrate Division (TCR-MD) 21. Considering Plaintiff’s
failure to comply with the court’s Order, dismissal is appropriate here. Now, therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.
Dated this day of January, 2018.
ALLISON R. BOOMER
MAGISTRATE
If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal, file a complaint in the
Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,
Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street,
Salem, OR.
Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final
Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed.
TCR-MD 19 B.
This document was signed by Magistrate Allison R. Boomer and entered on
January 30, 2018.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.