Petitions for review, November 21 and 27, 2019

769
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
(453 P3d 552-555)
ALLOWED
November 27, 2019
Schaffer v. SAIF Corporation (A153630)(S066008)(291 Or App 249) Jeremy R.
Schaffer’s petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is
vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration
in light of Garcia-Solis v. Farmers Ins. Co., 365 Or 26, 441 P3d 573 (2019).
DENIED
November 27, 2019
Baldwin v. Seida (A166511)(S067030)(297 Or App 67)
Department of Human Services v. J. C. A. (A170866)(S067092)(299 Or App 521)
Esquire Investments, Inc. v. Summers (A165799)(S067048)(299 Or App 123)
Estrada v. Federal Express Corporation (A164200)(S066999)(298 Or App 111)
Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of County Commissioners of Yamhill County
(A162581)(A162613)(S067011)(298 Or App 241)
Hall, Roger D. v. State of Oregon (A170452/53)(S067098)(299 Or App 521)
Runkel v. Esmay (A169155)(S066954)(298 Or App 493)
State of Oregon, by and through the Department of Land Conservation and
Development v. Yamhill County (A162583)(S067020)(298 Or App 260)
State v. Calloway, Timothy Bernard (A165344)(S067049)(298 Or App 554)
State v. Fossum, Mary Lourdes (A165037)(S067029)(298 Or App 554)
State v. Fuhrer, Mindy Joy (A167482)(S067123)(299 Or App 831)
State v. Stills, Frederick Percy (A166183)(S067010)(299 Or App 194)
DISMISSED
November 21, 2019
Department of Human Services v. S. A. W. (A170131)(A170137)(S067102)(299 Or
App 278)