Miscellaneous Supreme Court dispositions, March 25, 2010

116
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT
DISPOSITIONS
(228 P3d 1214, 1215)
BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED
March 25, 2010
Benoit v. Kroger (S058242). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's cer-
tified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 72 (2010) does not comply substan-
tially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the
Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed
ballot measure.
Benoit v. Kroger (S058243). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's cer-
tified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 73 (2010) does not comply substan-
tially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the
Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed
ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S058211). Petitioners' request for oral argument is
denied. Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title
for Initiative Petition No. 66 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS
250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State
the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S058219). Petitioners' argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 67 (2010) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (8058220). Petitioners' argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 69 (2010) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.035(2} to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S058262). Petitioners' argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 3 (2012) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.085(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.
Rogers et al v. Kroger (S058169). Petitioners' argument that the Attorney Gen-
eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 65 (2010) does not comply
substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies
to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the
proposed ballot measure.