1998 OK JUD ETH 2•JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-2
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-2
1998 OK JUD ETH 2Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel26.03.1998
Gesamter Gesetzestext
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-2
1998 OK JUD ETH 2
Decided: 03/26/1998
Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel
Cite as: 1998 OK JUD ETH 2, __ P.2d __
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
Judicial Ethics Opinion 98-2
March 26, 1998
¶0 QUESTION: Should a judge recuse in a divorce case where the certified public accountant, who has prepared the judge’s tax returns for several years, has been hired by the defendant to evaluate and testify as to the value of the plaintiff’s business?
¶1 ANSWER: This particular question is fact specific and we are unable to answer in a general broad statement. However, it is our opinion that the Judge must disclose the relationship to the attorneys and to the litigants and if asked to recuse, must do so. The Judge must not let the relationship influence his decision nor appear to influence his decision. Further, if there is a reasonable appearance of bias or prejudice, or if the circumstances cast doubt of impartiality to the public, the Judge should recuse.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.