2010 OK JUD ETH 1•JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2010-1
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2010-1
2010 OK JUD ETH 1Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel04.03.2010
Gesamter Gesetzestext
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2010-1
2010 OK JUD ETH 1
Decided: 03/04/2010
Cite as: 2010 OK JUD ETH 1, __ __
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2010-1
¶1 Question(s): (1) May a sitting judge be involved finding new counsel for clients who he had represented and to whom he had referred to other counsel before taking the bench and which attorney has represented them but is now quitting the practice of law before the cases were concluded?
¶2 Question(s): (2) May he pay the court costs to re-file a case of one of the former clients whose case was dismissed through lack of diligence by the attorney that he had recommended?
¶3 Facts: The judge took the bench in August of 2008, approximately eighteen months before the successor attorney decided to retire.
¶4 Answer: Question (1) – No.
¶5 Question (2) – We decline to answer as the question is not covered by the Code of Judicial Conduct.
¶6 Discussion: Almost 18 months has elapsed since another attorney assumed your practice. Nothing required your client, at the time you took the bench, of retaining the attorney who took over your practice. At this stage, for you to become involved in helping those clients whose cases which you were handling, to obtain new attorneys might leave the public impression that you were favoring some attorney over others and were recommending them over others and could be viewed as "favoring" them and acting on the impartial manner demanded of the judiciary.
Dated: 3-4-10
/s/Robert L. Bailey, Chairman
/s/Milton C. Craig, Secretary
/s/Robert E. Lavender
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.