A-1-CA-36774 | Omnilex

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Corrections to this opinion not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM
Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion is updated accordingly in Odyssey.
1 	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 THOMAS SCHROEDER,
3 	Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 	v. 	NO. A-1-CA-36774
5 RICHARD HILL,
6 	Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY
8 Cindy M. Mercer, District Judge
9 Vance, Chavez & Associates
10 Claud Eugene Vance
11 	Albuquerque, NM
12 for Appellee
13 	Richard Hill
14 Los Lunas, NM
15 	Pro Se Appellant
16
17 HANISEE,Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
18 	{l} 	Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
19 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
20 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
21 	{2} 	AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 8/15/2019 8:51 AM

1 {3} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4 	WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

9
10
11
12}

13
14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

Corrections to this opinion not affecting the outcome, at the Court’s discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM
Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
THOMAS SCHROEDER, Filed 8/15/2019 8:51 AM
Plaintiff-Appellee, AU. ~fe4
Mark Reynolds
V. NO. A-1-CA-36774
RICHARD HILL,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY

Cindy M. Mercer, District Judge
Vance, Chavez & Associates
Claud Eugene Vance
Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

Richard Hill
Los Lunas, NM

Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

2} AFFIRMED.

1/3; ITISSO ORDERED. ~

7 Wn

3 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

41 WE CONCUR:

5 Mogae 40) LY.
6|| MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judgy’)

August 15, 2019- Thomas Schroeder v. Richard Hill, No. A-1-CA-36774

Gesamter Gesetzestext

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort