ESTATE OF BRANDON DAVID CHAMBERS V CITY OF SOUTH HAVEN

Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan
Megan K. Cavanagh,
Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra
Richard H. Bernstein
Elizabeth M. Welch
Kyra H. Bolden
Kimberly A. Thomas
Noah P. Hood,
Justices
I, Elizabeth Kingston-Miller, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
April 3, 2026
a0331b
Order
Clerk
April 3, 2026
169198
CRYSTAL LEDUKE, Personal Representative
of the ESTATE OF BRANDON DAVID
CHAMBERS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v SC: 169198
COA: 371030
Van Buren CC: 2022-072271-NO
CITY OF SOUTH HAVEN,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
KATE HOSIER and WILLIAM BRENNER,
Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2025
judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral
argument on the application. MCR 7.305(I)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs
in accordance with MCR 7.312(E), addressing whether the Court of Appeals erred when it
held that there is no question of fact regarding the application of the proprietary function
exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1413, and that the defendant City of South
Haven is entitled to summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7).
The Government Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan and the Michigan
Municipal League are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case who are not exempt from
the motion requirement under MCR 7.312(H) may move the Court for permission to file
briefs amicus curiae.

-- 1 of 1 --