PINA STOCKING V CLOISE MICHAEL STOCKING

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
ORDER
PINA STOCKING V CLOISE MICHAEL STOCKING
Docket No. 381141
LC No. 2020-001153-DO
Stephen L. Borrello, Chief Judge Pro Tem, acting under MCR 7.203(F)(1), orders:
The claim of appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because the May 23, 2026
postjudgment order appealed from is not a final order as defined in MCR 7.202(6). MCR 7.203(A)(1).
The postjudgment order, which denied a motion for partial relief from the parties’ judgment of divorce is
not an order that grants or denies a motion to change legal custody, physical custody, or domicile under
MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii). The order also cannot be considered as the as “the first judgment or order” that
disposed of all the claims and adjudicated the rights and liabilities” of all the parties. MCR 7.202(6)(a)(i).
The November 19, 2020 judgment was the order meeting the definition in MCR 7.202(6)(a)(i). Dismissal
is without prejudice to the filing of a late appeal under MCR 7.205(A)(4), provided such a filing meets all
requirements under the court rules and is not time-barred.
June 17, 2026

-- 1 of 1 --