370851•PARAGON 28 INC V JON BUCK
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
ORDER
PARAGON 28 INC V JON BUCK
Docket No. 370851
LC No. 21-016518-CB
Mariam S. Bazzi
Presiding Judge
Michelle M. Rick
Allie Greenleaf Maldonado
Judges
The motion for leave to file a reply brief is DENIED and the motion for reconsideration of
this Court’s June 12, 2026 opinion is GRANTED. In this breach of contract action, this Court vacated the
trial court’s judgment and remanded this matter for further proceedings. Both parties agree that defendant
is entitled to damages for commissions on purchase orders submitted during September 2021 on sales
made prior to termination of the agreement but disagree as to the amount owed. In light of the parties’
general agreement, and because the Court’s June 12, 2026 opinion did not address this issue, we remand
with instructions that the trial court revisit the issue of damages. As appellate review would be aided by
further explanation, the trial court shall make a comprehensive record on the issues of damages, including
any reductions it deems appropriate and the legal basis for those reductions. We retain jurisdiction.
Presiding Judge
August 19, 2026
-- 1 of 1 --
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.