United States of America v. Schwarzbaum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 18-cv-81147-BLOOM/Reinhart

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ISAC SCHWARZBAUM,

Defendant.
_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the United States of America’s Opposed Motion
for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Isac Schwarzbaum Should Not Be Held in Civil
Contempt, ECF No. [189], filed on September 29, 2023 (“Motion”). Therein, the Government
requests that the Court issue an Order to Show Cause to Defendant Isac Schwarzbaum
(“Defendant”) and require him to explain why the Court should not hold him in contempt for
violating the Court’s Repatriation Order, ECF No. [176]. ECF No. [189] at 6. The Government
further requests that the Court impose such sanctions as the Court deems just and proper, including,
but not limited to, a monetary fine for each day Defendant fails to comply with the Repatriation
Order, and incarceration. Id.
The Motion was previously referred to the Honorable Bruce E. Reinhart for a Report and
Recommendations (“R&R”). See ECF No. [190]. On November 7, 2023, the Magistrate Judge
issued an R&R stating that the parties agreed that there was no need to conduct a show-cause
hearing separate from the merits of whether Defendant was not complying with the Repatriation
Order. ECF No. [196] at 3. The R&R finds that there is clear and convincing evidence that
Case 9:18-cv-81147-BB Document 199 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2023 Page 1 of 3

Case No. 18-cv-81147-BLOOM/Reinhart
2
Defendant can comply with the Repatriation Order, which the R&R finds to be unambiguous, and
that Defendant is nevertheless refusing to do so. Id. at 5. The R&R recommends that the Court
find Defendant in civil contempt and conduct an in-person hearing to determine the proper
sanction. Id. The R&R further states that the parties shall file any objections within fourteen days
of the date of service of a copy of the R&R. Id. The Government filed a notice on November 9,
2023 stating that it does not intend to file objections to the R&R. ECF No. [197] at 1. On November
13, 2023, Defendant filed a notice that he does not intend to file objections to the R&R either. ECF
No. [198] at 1.
Nevertheless, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R and the record in this
case and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291
(11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be well
reasoned and correct. The Court therefore agrees with the R&R’s find that Defendant has refused
to comply with the Repatriation Order despite his ability to do so. Therefore, since “[c]ourts have
inherent power to enforce compliance with their lawful orders through civil contempt”, see
Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Watkins, 943 F.2d 1297, 1301 (11th Cir. 1991) (citing
Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 370, 86 S. Ct. 1531, 1535, 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966)), the
Court concludes that the Motion must be GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1.The R&R, ECF No. [196], is ADOPTED;
2.The Motion, ECF No. [189], is GRANTED; and
3.The parties shall appear at Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse,
400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128, on March 1, 2024, at 9:00
Case 9:18-cv-81147-BB Document 199 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2023 Page 2 of 3

Case No. 18-cv-81147-BLOOM/Reinhart
3
a.m. for the Court to determine the appropriate sanction for violating this Court’s
Order to Repatriate Foreign Assets, ECF No. [176].
4. A copy of this Order, together with the United States’ Motion for Order to Show
Cause and exhibits, shall be served on Defendant Isac Schwarzbaum by counsel for
the United States by email to Mr. Schwarzbaum’s counsel of record.
5. Proof of service done pursuant to paragraph 4, above, shall be filed with the Clerk
as soon as practicable.
6. At least 14 days prior to the date of the hearing set forth above, Defendant Isac
Schwarzbaum shall submit, in a writing filed with the Clerk of the Court, argument
regarding the appropriate sanction. The Government may file a reply to any
opposition at least 7 days prior to the date set for the hearing.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on December 6, 2023.

_________________________________
BETH BLOOM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case 9:18-cv-81147-BB Document 199 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2023 Page 3 of 3