State of Iowa v. Stanley Edwin Spencer

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
_______________

No. 25-0217
Filed March 11, 2026
_______________

State of Iowa,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
Stanley Edwin Spencer,
Defendant–Appellant.
_______________

Discretionary review from the Iowa District Court for Appanoose County,
The Honorable Rose Anne Mefford, Judge.
_______________

REVERSED AND REMANDED
_______________

R.E. Breckenridge (until withdrawal) of Breckenridge Law P.C., Ottumwa,
attorney for appellant.

Stanley Spencer, Moravia, self-represented appellant.

Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and Benjamin Parrott, Assistant Attorney
General, attorneys for appellee.
_______________

Considered without oral argument
by Tabor, C.J., Langholz, J., and Vogel, S.J.
Opinion by Vogel, S.J.

1
VOGEL, Senior Judge.

Stanley Spencer appeals an order assessing liquidated damages against
him after he was convicted of twenty counts of abandonment of a dead or
injured animal in violation of Iowa Code section 481A.137 (2021). Spencer
argues that, based on the plain language of the relevant Iowa Code provisions,
his convictions did not support an award of liquidated damages. On our
review, we agree and reverse the liquidated-damages award.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Spencer farms approximately 800 acres of land in Appanoose County.
According to Spencer, for many years he had experienced issues with large
groups of deer eating his crops. Spencer tried a variety of strategies to get rid
of the deer, including permitting hunters on his land during hunting season
and using high-powered, motion-activated lights to deter the presence of the
deer. These tactics were unsuccessful.

Spencer, asserting he had “no other choice,” decided to take matters
into his own hands. From January 10 through 21, 2021, he shot at least forty
deer in his fields. Spencer left some of the deer where he shot them—he took
others to a brush pile. Spencer did not have a license to kill any of the deer,
did not field dress or process any of the deer meat for consumption, and did
not alert any authorities that he had killed the deer. He later admitted to
shooting the deer.

The State charged Spencer with twenty counts of abandonment of a
dead or injured animal in violation of Iowa Code section 481A.137 and twenty
counts of restricted taking of deer in violation of section 481A.38, all simple
misdemeanors. All forty counts were tried together in magistrate court in
July 2022.

2
After trial, the jury returned not guilty verdicts on the twenty
restricted-taking counts but found Spencer guilty of the twenty counts of
abandonment. Spencer’s convictions were affirmed on appeal to the district
associate court. Spencer filed an application for discretionary appellate
review of his convictions, which was denied.

In the meantime, the State, relying on Iowa Code section 481A.130,
requested $15,000 in liquidated damages for ten antlerless deer.1 Spencer
resisted.

On May 3, 2024, the magistrate court held a hearing to consider the
State’s request. After the hearing, the court permitted the parties additional
time to submit briefing on the liquidated-damages issue.

On June 25, after considering the parties’ arguments, the court
determined that Spencer should pay $7,500 in liquidated damages, $750 per
deer for ten antlerless deer. In reaching this conclusion, the court found:
[T]he guilty conviction of the Defendant for the charge of Abandonment
of an Animal is relevant in the decision whether or not to require the
payment of liquidated damages. The Iowa Code states that the liquidated
damages should be charged when a person is convicted of destroying or
possessing any animal. In order for abandonment to occur, possession
must precede. Therefore possession did occur. In the argument for
destruction, the court finds that the definition of “destroy” as given by the
State is significant and credible.

1
Due to an alleged scrivener’s error, the State requested reimbursement for only
ten of the twenty deer. In deciding the liquidated-damages issue, the court noted “the
State had ample time to supplement their request for damages . . . and failed to do so.
Accordingly, the court finds that the State is limited to damages related to only ten deer,
not twenty.” The State did not appeal this finding.

3
Spencer appealed to the district associate court, which affirmed the
liquidated-damages award. He then applied for discretionary appellate
review, which our supreme court granted.

II. Standard of Review.

We review issues of statutory construction and interpretation for
correction of errors at law. See Branstad v. State ex rel. Nat. Res. Comm’n, 871
N.W.2d 291, 294 (Iowa 2015); State v. McCullah, 787 N.W.2d 90, 93
(Iowa 2010).

III. Analysis.

On appeal, Spencer asserts that abandonment is not specified in the
liquidated-damages statute, and therefore the statute does not apply to
someone who failed to properly dispose of a dead animal. The State argues
that the magistrate court was correct in determining the abandonment statute
spilled over to section 481A.130, such that Spencer both unlawfully
“possessed” and “destroyed” the deer, triggering liquidated damages.

To determine whether Spencer was convicted of any action subject to
liquidated damages, we first consider the statute under which he was
convicted, which provides:
While taking or attempting to take game or fur-bearing animals, a person
shall not abandon an injured game or fur-bearing animal without making a
reasonable effort to retrieve the animal from the field. A person shall not
leave a useable portion of game or a fur-bearing animal in the field.

Iowa Code § 481A.137(1).

4
We next consider the liquidated-damages provision, which provides,
in relevant part:
1. In addition to the penalties for violations of this chapter . . . , a person
convicted of unlawfully selling, taking, catching, killing, injuring,
destroying, or having in possession any animal, shall reimburse the state
for the value of such as follows:

....

h. For each deer, except as provided in paragraph “g”,2 . . . one thousand
five hundred dollars.

....

Iowa Code § 481A.130(1)(h) (emphasis added).3

The liquidated-damages statute does not include the conduct made
unlawful by the abandonment statute. It specifically states it applies to one
who is “convicted of unlawfully . . . destroying, or having in possession”—
neither of which was Spencer “convicted.” Even if leaving a deer to rot in a
field resulted in “possessing” and “destroying” the deer, the abandonment
statute does not criminalize such possession or destruction.

From a plain reading of the two statutes, Spencer’s conviction under
the abandonment statute did not trigger the liquidated-damages provision
and must be reversed.

2
Paragraph “g” applied to “antlered deer,” which is not applicable in this case.
3
Section 481A.130 was amended in 2022 to change the penalty for “each
antlerless deer” from $1,500 to $750. See Iowa Code § 481.130(1)(h) (2022). The
magistrate court used the current version of the statute when assessing liquidated
damages in this case. The State did not appeal the magistrate court decision to assess
$750 per deer. For that reason, we accept the magistrate court’s valuation. The 2022
amendments to section 481A.130 do not otherwise affect this appeal.

5
IV. Conclusion.

We conclude the magistrate court, as affirmed on appeal, improperly
imposed a liquidated-damages award against Spencer. We reverse and
remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

6