CourtListener 870869•Sakamaki v. GLACS LLC
Gesamter Gesetzestext
LAW LIBRA! ”
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
NO. 30357 s
oS
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS — “T)
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I i rr:
= a
“al oO
BRIAN L. SAKAMAKI and DONNA J. WALDEN,
Trustee of the Donna J. Walden Revocable Living Trust
dated September 14, 1988, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Vv.
GLACS LLC, a Hawaii Limited Liability Company, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 08-1-1601)
-ORDER DENYING JUNE 7, 2010 HRAP RULE 40 MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF MAY 28, 2010 ORDER GRANTING MARCH 23, 2010
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DENYING
MARCH 23, 2010 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS
(By: Nakamura, C.J., Leonard and Reifurth, JJ.)
Upon review of (1) the May 28, 2010 order granting
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants/Appellees Brian L. Sakamaki
(Appellee Sakamaki) and Donna z. Walden's (Appellee Walden)
March 23, 2010 motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of
appellate jurisdiction and denying Appellee Sakamaki and Appellee
Walden's motion for an award of attorney's fees and costs (the
May 28, 2010 dismissal order), (2) Defendants/Counterclaim-
Plaintiffs/Appellants GLACS, LLC (Appellant GLACS), and Kokua
Home Care, LLC's (Appellant Kokua Home Care), June 7, 2010 motion
for reconsideration of the May 28, 2010 dismissal order pursuant
to Rule 40 of the Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP),
and (3) the record, it appears that the intermediate court of
appeals did not overlook or misapprehend any points of law or
fact when the intermediate court of appeals entered the May 28,
2010 dismissal order. Therefore, Appellant GLACS and Appellant
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Kokua Home Care's June 7, 2010 HRAP Rule 40 motion for
reconsideration of the May 28, 2010 dismissal order lacks merit.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant GLACS and Appellant
Kokua Home Care's June 7, 2010 HRAP Rule 40 motion for
reconsideration of the May 28, 2010 dismissal order is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, June 15, 2010.
Coes, el Haharmite
Chief Judge
Associate Judge
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.