CourtListener 10638794•Citizens Bank, N.A. v. Bolomet
Gesamter Gesetzestext
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
22-JUL-2025
08:37 AM
Dkt. 40 ODSD
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
CITIZENS BANK, N.A. fka RBS CITIZENS N.A.
and CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v.
PASCAL CHRISTOPHE BOLOMET,
Defendant-Appellee; and
ROUTH THERESA SOUZE BOLOMET,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appelant,
and
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECTION,
Defendant-Appellee, and
JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10;
DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10 AND
DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants,
and
MOR ELKESLASSY, Purchaser-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 1CC161000893)
ORDER
(By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard, and Wadsworth, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that:
(1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief
were due on or before May 19, 2025, and June 18, 2025,
respectively;
(2) Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant Routh Theresa
Souza Bolomet (Routh Bolomet) failed to file either document,
or request an extension of time;
(3) On June 19, 2025, the appellate clerk entered a
default notice informing Routh Bolomet that the time for filing
the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.