AJ Logistics LLC v. Bartlett Ventures LLC

United States District Court
For The District of Wyoming
AJ LOGISTICS LLC d/b/a BLU AUTO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BARTLETT VENTURES LLC d/b/a
WYOMING DIESEL SERVICE ,
Defendants,
Case No. 24-CV-00147-SWS
INITIAL PRETRIAL ORDER
On September 30, 2024, an initial pretrial conference was held in this matter under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 16 and U.S.D.C.L.R. 16.1 before the Honorable Stephanie A. Hambrick, United
States Magistrate Judge for the District of Wyoming. Participating counsel included Mr. Jason
Ochs on behalf of Plaintiff, and Mr. Trevor Schenk representing Defendant. 	After hearing
from the parties, the Court set forth the following trial schedule.
(a) JURISDICTION AND VENUE —
The Court has jurisdiction over both the parties and the subject matter of this action,
and venue is properly in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. Proper
service of process has been accomplished on all parties, and no parties are erroneously joined
in or omitted from the action.
(b) CONSENT TO TRIAL BY M AGISTRATE JUDGE —
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 1 of 12

2
The parties are aware of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and U.S.D.C.L.R. 73.1(a)
and acknowledge that this case will proceed before the District Judge assigned hereto and not
before the Magistrate Judge. However, the parties are not precluded from consenting to trial before
a Magistrate Judge at least sixty (60) days prior to the trial date.
(c) CLAIMS AND DEFENSES —
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff alleges breach of contract, misrepresentation, and breach of warranty by
Defendant as they relate to repairs undertaken by Defendant to Plaintiff’s commercial truck.
Defendant:
Defendant denies all allegations.
(d) COMPLEXITY OF THE CASE —
The undersigned Judge is of the opinion that this is a non-complex case.
(e) RULE 26(F) S CHEDULING CONFERENCE —
The parties have complied with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
(f) 	S ELF E XECUTING ROUTINE DISCOVERY , DISCOVERY DISPUTES , AND DUTY TO
S UPPLEMENT—
(1) The parties will comply with the initial disclosure exchanges required by Fed. R.
Civ. P. 26(a)(1) no later than Wednesday, October 30, 2024.
(2) Pursuant to U.S.D.C.L.R 37.1(b), the parties shall confer regarding any discovery
dispute, and in the event the parties cannot settle the discovery dispute on their own,
counsel shall jointly contact Judge Hambrick’s Chambers prior to filing any written
discovery motions.
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 2 of 12

3
(3) The parties have a continuing duty to supplement or correct all discovery
disclosures or responses in accordance with Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
(g) PROPOSED ORDERS —
Proposed orders regarding non-dispositive motions filed in this matter should be submitted
to 	Judge 	Hambrick’s 	chambers 	in 	Microsoft 	Word 	format 	via 	email 	to
wyojudgesah@wyd.uscourts.gov. 	Proposed orders regarding dispositive motions filed in this
matter should be submitted to Judge Skavdahl’s chambers in Microsoft Word format via email to
wyojudgesws@wyd.uscourts.gov.
(h) AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS — Friday, November 29, 2024
Any motions to amend the pleadings or add additional parties shall be filed on or before
Friday, November 29, 2024.
(i) E XPERT WITNESS DESIGNATION —
Plaintiff’s Designation Deadline — Monday, February 24, 2025
Defendants’ Designation Deadline — Wednesday, March 26, 2025
The parties shall designate expert witnesses in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2),
U.S.D.C.L.R. 26.1(e), and the following:
(1) 	Plaintiff shall designate expert witnesses and provide Defendant with a complete
summary of the testimony of each expert by Monday, February 24, 2025.
Defendant shall designate expert witnesses and provide Plaintiff with a complete
summary of the testimony of each expert by Wednesday, March 26, 2025.
(2) 	These summaries shall include a comprehensive statement of the expert’s opinions
and the bases for the opinions. See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 626 F.2d 784 (10th
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 3 of 12

4
Cir. 1980) (reversing $800,000 jury verdict where the plaintiff’s medical expert’s
testimony exceeded the scope of the designation and summary). 	This expert
designation with summary does not satisfy the obligation to provide an expert
report under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) for retained experts; the
parties must still disclose, and file with the Court, their written expert reports
required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B). See Vincent v. Nelson, 51 F.4th 1200 1213-22 (10th
Cir. 2022) (discussing and contrasting disclosure requirements for retained experts
versus non-retained experts).
(3) 	In cases where treating medical or mental health providers, including vocational
rehabilitation specialists, may or will be called to testify at trial in part or in full as
an expert witness, the party calling that witness shall designate that medical or
mental health provider as an expert witness.
(4) 	The party designating the expert witness shall set forth all special conditions or
requirements which the designating party or the expert witness will insist upon with
respect to the taking of their depositions, including the amount of compensation the
expert witness will require and the rate per unit of time at which said compensation
will be payable. In the event counsel is unable to obtain such information to include
in the designation, the efforts to obtain the same and the inability to obtain such
information shall be set forth in the designation. U.S.D.C.L.R. 26.1(e).
(5) 	A party may depose the opposing party’s experts after the discovery cutoff date
but must complete the depositions fourteen (14) days prior to the final pretrial
conference.
(6) 	The parties shall serve upon one another, and file with the Court, their written
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 4 of 12

5
expert and summary reports pursuant to Rules 26(a)(2)(B) and 26(a)(2)(C) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(j) L ISTING OF O THER WITNESSES — Thursday, April 10, 2025
The parties shall list all other witnesses that may be called at trial, other than the
witnesses already identified in the initial disclosures and the expert witnesses to be designated
as set forth above, on or before Thursday, April 10, 2025. Such listing of witnesses shall
include the name, address, and a summary of the expected testimony of each witness. Copies
of such witness lists shall be filed with the Court. Witnesses not listed or included in initial
disclosures will be prohibited from testifying, absent consent of the Court for good cause
shown. Testimony not reasonably set out in the summary may be disallowed on motion of the
opposing party.
(k) DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE — Thursday, May 22, 2025
The discovery cutoff date is Thursday, May 22, 2025. All written discovery requests
shall be served upon and received by opposing counsel on or before the discovery cutoff date.
All discovery depositions shall be completed by the discovery cutoff date. Subject to the
limitations set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 32, trial depositions may be taken up to seven (7) days
prior to the trial date. 	The parties have agreed to increase the number of fact depositions to
fifteen per side.
(l) DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND DAUBERT CHALLENGES1 —
1 A “Daubert Challenge” refers to those challenges made to the validity or admissibility
of an expert’s opinion testimony based upon the requirements under Daubert v. Merrell Dow
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S.
137 (1999).; And Fed. R. Evid. 702.
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 5 of 12

6
Filing Deadline – Thursday, June 5, 2025
Response Deadline – Thursday, June 19, 2025
Dispositive Motion Hearing – Thursday, June 26, 2025, at 1:00 p.m.
(1) 	The deadline for the parties to file all dispositive motions and Daubert
challenges together with briefs and materials in support thereof is Thursday,
June 5, 2025. The parties shall file responsive briefs and materials on or before
Thursday, June 19, 2025.
(2) 	If a dispositive motion or Daubert challenge is filed sooner the above deadline,
then a response is due within 21 days of the filing. Each party is limited to a
single dispositive motion of 25-pages unless otherwise allowed by the Court.
The parties shall strictly comply with all other provisions of U.S.D.C.L.R. 7.1.
(3) 	The dispositive motions are hereby set for oral hearing before the Honorable
Scott W. Skavdahl on Thursday, June 26, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. at the Ewing T.
Kerr Federal Building in Casper, Wyoming. 2
(m) STIPULATIONS AS TO FACTS — July 3, 2025
The parties shall exchange proposals for stipulations as to facts. The parties shall then
confer and file with the Court their stipulations as to the facts in three (3) packets: packet #1
shall be those facts to which both parties agree, packet #2 shall include the facts to which
Plaintiffs seek to stipulate and Defendants do not, and packet #3 shall include the facts to which
Defendants seek to stipulate and Plaintiffs do not. The parties shall file these packets with the
Court by July 3, 2025.
2 Any Daubert challenges will be addressed on the briefing unless otherwise requested and ordered by the Court.
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 6 of 12

7
(n) MOTIONS IN LIMINE —
Filing Deadline – Thursday, July 3, 2025
Response Deadline – Thursday, July 17, 2025
Motions in Limine or motions relating to the exclusion of evidence, limited to 15 pages
contained in a single motion, shall be filed no later than Thursday, July 3, 2025. Responses
shall be filed no later than Thursday, July 17, 2025. If a motion in limine is filed sooner the
above deadline, then a response is due within fourteen (14) days of the filing. Unless otherwise
determined, the Court will rule on any motions in limine at the final pretrial conference. No
replies are permitted without leave of the Court.
(o) FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE — Thursday, July 24, 2025, at 1:00 p.m.
A final pretrial conference in this matter has been scheduled for 1:00 p.m. on
Thursday, July 24, 2025, at the Ewing T. Kerr Federal Building in Casper, Wyoming before
the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl. Counsel for the parties shall appear in person.
(1) Before the conference, Counsel for represented parties all must agree upon, prepare,
and sign a joint proposed Final Pretrial Order prepared for Judge Skavdahl’s
signature 	in 	the 	format 	provided 	on 	the 	District 	Court 	Website
(www.wyd.uscourts.gov) under civil forms for Judge Skavdahl. This form will take
the place of a final pretrial memorandum. If you cannot locate the form, please
contact Judge Skavdahl’s chambers. All represented parties are jointly responsible
for the preparation of the proposed Final Pretrial Order. 	A copy of the proposed
order must be delivered directly to Judge Skavdahl’s chambers in Microsoft Word
(but not filed) via e-mail to wyojudgesws@wyd.uscourts.gov or by U.S. Mail at
least seven (7) days before the final pretrial conference.
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 7 of 12

8
(2) Witness and exhibit lists must be exchanged by the parties (but not filed) at least
ten (10) days before the final pretrial conference. Exhibit lists and witness lists must
be included as part of the proposed Final Pretrial Order in accordance with the
instructions in the form order. The parties are not required to list rebuttal witnesses
or impeachment exhibits.
(3) Copies of all exhibits in either electronic or paper form must be brought to the final
pretrial conference. If an exhibit is not brought to the final pretrial conference and
an objection to the exhibit is asserted, the exhibit may be excluded from evidence
for noncompliance with this order.
(p) E XHIBIT PREPARATION —
Exhibits must be prepared for the final pretrial conference and for trial in accordance with
the following instructions:
(1) 	Marking Exhibits. All exhibits must be marked by the parties before trial. Plaintiff
shall list and mark each exhibit with numerals and the case number, e.g., “Case
23CV990 Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1.” Defendant shall list and mark each exhibit with letters
and the case number, e.g., “Case 23CV990 Defendant’s Exhibit A.” In the event there
are multiple plaintiffs and/or defendants, please identify the particular party in the
exhibit marking, e.g., “Case 23CV990 Plaintiff Smith Exhibit 1” or “Case 23CV990
Defendant Smith, Inc. Exhibit A.” Unambiguous abbreviations may also be used, such
as “Case 23CV990 P’s Ex. 1.” U.S.D.C.L.R. 16.2(b)(2).
(2) 	Elimination of Duplicate. The parties should compare the exhibits and eliminate
duplicates. If more than one party wants to offer the same exhibit, then it should be
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 8 of 12

9
marked with a number and listed as a joint exhibit on the exhibit list of the
plaintiff(s).
(3) 	Copies for the Court. Before trial, each party must supply the Court with one (1)
hard copy and one (1) electronic/digital copy of all exhibits to be used at trial. The
hard copies of exhibits should be placed in a ringed binder with a copy of the exhibit
list at the front and with each exhibit tabbed.
(q) E XHIBIT L ISTS —
The parties’ exhibit lists are to be prepared in the following format:
EXHIBI
T NO . DESCRIPTION 	F ILE NAME
OBJECTIONS
(CITE
F ED .R.EVID)
C ATEGO
RY
A, B, C
OFFERED
ADMIT/NO
T
ADMITTED
(A)-(NA)*
(e.g. *****.pdf)
(e.g.
*****.jpeg)
* This column is for use by the trial judge at trial.
The following categories are to be used for objections to exhibits:
(1) Category A. No objections. These exhibits are admissible upon motion of any party,
and will be available for use by any party at any stage of the proceedings without further
proof or objection.
Category B. 	These exhibits are objected to on grounds other than foundation,
identification, or authenticity. 	This category should be used for objections such as
hearsay or relevance.
Category C. These exhibits are objected to on grounds of foundation, identification,
or authenticity. This category should not be used for other grounds, such as hearsay or
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 9 of 12

10
relevance. Failure to indicate objections to foundation shall be deemed to be a waiver
of objections as to foundation for listed exhibits. 	Any party establishing foundation
over objection may move for attorney fees and costs necessary to establish the
foundation.
(2) Any Counsel requiring authentication of an exhibit must so notify the offering counsel
in writing within five (5) business days after the exhibit is made available to opposing
counsel for examination. Failure to do so is an admission of authenticity.
(3) Any exhibit not listed on the exhibit lists is subject to exclusion at trial. The Court may
deem any objection not stated on the exhibit list as waived.
(r) WITNESS L ISTS —
The parties shall identify all witnesses they will call or may call and shall further
identify whether each witness will testify in person, by deposition, or by video tape.
In bench trials, Witness Statements shall be provided for expert witnesses and witnesses
whose testimony involves significant technical matters, but no significant issues of credibility.
Witness statements shall be prepared and used at trial in accordance with Judge Skavdahl’s
Procedure for Presentation of Direct Testimony by Witness Statement, which is available on
the Court’s website under forms or by contacting Judge Skavdahl’s chambers.
(s) JURY EVIDENCE RECORDING S YSTEM (JERS) —
The Court uses the Jury Evidence Recording System (JERS) for the electronic
submission of exhibits to the jury (or to the Court in the case of a bench trial). JERS allows
jurors to review evidence (documentary, photo, or video exhibits) on a large flat panel monitor
during deliberations. 	The parties must provide their trial exhibits in electronic format on a
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 10 of 12

11
USB drive, DVD, or CD to the office of the Clerk of Court no later than 7 days prior to the
start of trial.
All electronic evidence should be provided using the following formats:
• 	Documents and Photographs: .pdf, .jpg, .bmp, .tif, .gif
• 	Video and Audio Recordings: .avi, .wmv, .mpg, .mp3, .mp4, .wma, .wav
Individual files should not exceed 500MB. 	If possible, exhibits approaching or
exceeding this size limit should be separated into multiple files. Parties may obtain additional
information regarding the submission of electronic exhibits by contacting the Clerk’s Office.
(t) JURY TRIAL — Monday, August 18, 2025
A jury trial is set before the Honorable Scott W Skavdahl for 9:00 a.m. on Monday,
August 18, 2025, in Casper, Wyoming, and is expected to last five (5) days. 	This case is
stacked #1 on the Court’s docket. U.S.D.C.L.R. 40.1(a).
(u) PROPOSED V OIR DIRE Q UESTIONS , JURY I NSTRUCTIONS AND V ERDICT FORMS, AND JOINT
STATEMENT —
At least seven (7) days before the trial, the parties shall exchange and file proposed voir
dire questions, jury instructions, special verdict form, and a joint statement (all subject to the
parties’ right to supplement such proposals at trial due to matters that cannot be reasonably
foreseen).
(1) The proposed jury instructions and special verdict forms shall also be submitted directly
to Judge Skavdahl’s chambers via email to wyojudgesws@wyd.uscourts.gov. 	The
instructions must be formatted as a single document for Word and shall include
citations to authority but should not include a signature block at the bottom of each
instruction.
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 11 of 12

12
(2) The parties’ joint statement shall set forth briefly and simply, in a noncontentious
manner, the background of the case and the claims and defenses being asserted. The
joint statement will serve as the basis for informing the jury panel of the background of
the case prior to voir dire. 	The parties should make every effort to agree upon the
language for the statement. To the extent the parties cannot agree, they should use the
following format: “Plaintiff contends . . . .; Defendant contends . . . .”
(v) S ETTLEMENT POSSIBILITIES —
The settlement possibilities of this case are considered by the undersigned Judge to be
fair.
Dated this 30th day of September, 2024.
Stephanie A. Hambrick
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:24-cv-00147-SWS Document 11 Filed 09/30/24 Page 12 of 12