Wedco Manufacturing Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING
In re
WEDCO MANUFACTURING, INC.
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 	12-21003
Chapter 11
Debtor.
OPINION ON OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM NO. 9-1
On July 9, 2014, the Debtor's Objection to Claim No. 9-1 came before the court
for an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Fredrick Mizell ("Mizell") filed a response. At the
conclusion of the hearing, the court took the matter under advisement. Having reviewed
the record, testimony and other evidence, and the parties' arguments, the court is
prepared to rule.
Jurisdiction
The court has jurisdiction over this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334.
This is a core proceeding within the definition of28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).
Facts
Wedco Manufacturing Inc. ("Debtor") filed its Chapter 11 petition on October 3,
2012. Mr. Mizell filed a priority claim in Debtor's case for unpaid vacation pay in the
amount of$2,146.80.
Marjorie Mathiesen ("Mathiesen"), Debtor's president, testified that the Debtor is
an asset holding company. Wedco Fabrication, Inc. ("Fabrication") was the operating
company involved in the building and construction industry. Debtor and Fabrication
Case 12-21003 Doc 150 Filed 07/15/14 Entered 07/15/14 15:11:51 Desc Main
Document Page 1 of 3

maintained separate employee identification numbers and separate bank accounts.
Debtor last had employees in 2001. According to the evidence presented, Debtor
initially filed as a Wyoming business entity on September 8, 1969. Fabrication filed as a
Wyoming business entity on June 18, 2001. After that, all employees were employed by
Fabrication.
The court's review of the evidence reflects that each corporation is listed
separately with the State of Wyoming, Secretary of State. Ms. Mathiesen was the
registered agent for both. However the principal addresses and mailing addresses are not
identical, nor are the officers the same. Debtor lists Ms. Mathiesen as President and
Judith Kortum as Secretary. Fabrication lists Fredrick Kortum as Vice President. Ms.
Mathiesen testified that she is not an officer for Fabrication.
The payroll evidence reflects that Mizell was paid by Fabrication and received a
W-2 form in 2013 from his employer, Fabrication.
Discussion
Mr. Mizell argues that as the Debtor was the holding company for Fabrication,
Debtor is responsible for Fabrication's debts and specifically for Mizell's claim.
A properly filed proof of claim constitutes prima facie evidence of the validity and
amount of the claim. 1 Such a claim is deemed allowed unless a party in interest objects.2
I Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(t).
2 11 U.S.C. § 502(a).
Page 2
Case 12-21003 Doc 150 Filed 07/15/14 Entered 07/15/14 15:11:51 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 3

The objecting party has the burden of going forward with evidence supporting the
objection. Such evidence must be of a probative force equal to that of the allegations
contained in the proof of claim. However, an objection raising only legal issues is
sufficient. Once the objecting party has reached this threshold, the creditor has the
ultimate burden of persuasion as to the validity and amount of the claim. 3
Mr. Mizell did not carry his burden proving that Debtor, as a separate legal entity,
was responsible for Fabrication's debts. No evidence was presented to give the court
cause to consider "piercing the corporate veil" of the Debtor. Mr. Mizell did not prove
the validity of his claim against Debtor.
The court finds that Mizell's claim against Debtor is not valid. Therefore, the
claim shall be disallowed.
This opinion constitutes the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. A
separate order shall be entered pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9021.
DATED this IS day of July, 2014.
Service to:
Stephen Winship
Fredrick Mizell
By the Court
(~~~~-)
HONORABL-E-PETER J. MCNIFF
Unitedstates Bankruptcy Judge
3 In re Geneva Steel Co. 260 B.R. 517 (lOth Cir. BAP 2001) In re Harrison, 987 F.2d 677 (lOth Cir. 1993).
Page 3
Case 12-21003 Doc 150 Filed 07/15/14 Entered 07/15/14 15:11:51 Desc Main
Document Page 3 of 3