3:25-cv-00697•Chan, Keith v. Bacdayan, Karen et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KEITH CHAN, Plaintiff, v. KAREN MAY BACDAYAN, KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN, and RE/MAX, Defendants. OPINION and ORDER 25-cv-697-jdp Plaintiff Keith Chan, proceeding without counsel, attempts to bring a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against three parties, including Re/Max, the owner of his apartment. I dismissed Chan’s original complaint because it was far too vague to state a claim. Dkt. 4. I directed him to file an amended complaint and warned him that if he failed to do so I would dismiss the entire case. Id. Chan has not filed an amended complaint by his deadline for doing so, so I will dismiss the case. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. This case is DISMISSED. 2. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Entered January 7, 2026. BY THE COURT: /s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge Case: 3:25-cv-00697-jdp Document #: 5 Filed: 01/07/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.