Chan, Keith v. Bacdayan, Karen et al

3:25-cv-00697Wiwd07.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
KEITH CHAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
KAREN MAY BACDAYAN,
KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN,
and RE/MAX,
Defendants.
OPINION and ORDER
25-cv-697-jdp
Plaintiff Keith Chan, proceeding without counsel, attempts to bring a claim under the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against three parties, including
Re/Max, the owner of his apartment. I dismissed Chan’s original complaint because it was far
too vague to state a claim. Dkt. 4. I directed him to file an amended complaint and warned
him that if he failed to do so I would dismiss the entire case. Id. Chan has not filed an amended
complaint by his deadline for doing so, so I will dismiss the case.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. 	This case is DISMISSED.
2. 	The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
Entered January 7, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
Case: 3:25-cv-00697-jdp Document #: 5 Filed: 01/07/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.