Perez v. Hyannis Air Service, Inc. Dba Cape Air

1:10-cv-00086Vid02.12.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. CROIX
5
EDWARD PEREZ, 5
5
Plaintiff, 5 1:10-cv-86
v. 5
5
HYANNIS AIR SERVICE, INC. d/b/a 5
CAPE AIR, 5
5
Defendant. 5
____________________________________5
TO: Lee J. Rohn, Esq.
Stephanie L. Adler, Esq.
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s
Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue and Plaintiff’s Motion
Nunc Pro Tunc For Leave to File Supplemental Exhibit (Docket No. 12). This order is
issued without necessity of response.
In view of the Court’s denial of Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s
order denying Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file his response to Defendant’s
motion to transfer venue and subsequent order deciding the said motion to transfer venue,
the Court will grant Defendant’s motion to strike.
Case: 1:10-cv-00086-RAM-EAH Document #: 13 Filed: 12/02/10 Page 1 of 2
Perez v. Hyannis Air Service
1:10-cv-86
Order
Page 2
WHEREFORE, it is now hereby ORDERED:
1. Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to
Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue and Plaintiff’s Motion Nunc Pro Tunc
For Leave to File Supplemental Exhibit (Docket No. 12) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff’s Response and Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
to Transfer Venue Based on Forum Non Conveniens and For Application of
Massachusetts Law (Docket No. 8) is STRICKEN.
3. Plaintiff’s Motion Nunc Pro Tunc For Leave to File Supplemental Exhibit,
Plaintiff’s Affidavit[,] One Day Out of Time (Docket No. 10) is STRICKEN.
ENTER:
Dated: December 2, 2010 /s/ George W. Cannon, Jr.
GEORGE W. CANNON, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 1:10-cv-00086-RAM-EAH Document #: 13 Filed: 12/02/10 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.